Military Appreciation Day
Saturday, September 30th, 2006The UK College Dems will be having a “military appreciation day” on Wednesday, October 4. I suppose I understand the “political” motivations behind such a thing. And, I imagine they’re about the same as those that led to a 100-0 vote in the Senate recently on a $70 Billion appropriations bill for the war in Iraq. Or, the same as the motivations that led 12 Dems to vote for the torture bill on Thursday. Nobody wants to be soft on “defense.” And, apparently nobody wants to ask the hard questions about what is being “defended.”
I don’t appreciate the military. And, I’m saddened that the Dems (at UK and across America) can’t see beyond their very narrow “political” goals.
I say I don’t appreciate the military. What does that mean? What is the military? I don’t think we should think of it as a specific group of people. Indeed, every day the set of people “in the military” changes, but the military itself does not. So, when I say that I don’t appreciate the military, I don’t mean that I don’t like the people or that I think everyone ”in the military” is bad. I know plenty of people who are or were ”in the military” that I think are great people. There are also, obviously, a bunch of assholes ”in the military.” It’s as ridiculous to believe that everyone ”in the military” is a hero or a great person as it is to believe that everyone “in college” is a genius or a rational person. Institutions don’t work like that. People (good people, bad people) find themselves “in” institutions - they enact them. Mostly, this doesn’t promote or discourage good or evil behavior. By and large, institutions are value neutral - so long as one behaves in conformity with the rules of the institution, it is not disturbed by otherwise commendable or repugnant actions. I don’t ”appreciate the miliaty.” This doesn’t mean that I don’t like anyone who is or was in the military. Just the same, it doesn’t mean that I think everyone in the military is a great person.
So, what is the military? The military is the instrument of warfare. It is the institution that prepares for war and orders the behavior of humans such that they are capable of engaging in warfare. This I do not appreciate. I do not find it of value that human beings be made capable of engaging in war - that they be ordered (both in the sense of commanded and in the sense of arranged) to kill other humans. Indeed, warfare is the ultimate confusion concerning what is of value (the word ”war” comes from the Old High German ”werran” meaning to confuse). The conduct of war (again this should be taken in the double sense of the actual engagement in warfare and the behavior that enacts such an engagement) presupposes that human lives are less valuable than some proposed objective or goal (e.g. homeland security or procurement of oil). But, of coure, humans are priceless (or worthless). There is no goal that justifies murdering us - we are worth nothing in that we always transcend the realm of any possible e-valuation. Warfare puts a price on human life - anyone is potential “collateral damage.” The military is the institution that is called for and grounded in the misguided attempt to make human life “valuable.” The word “army” is derived from the same word as “arm” (think of “taking up arms” and “armament”) which is at once the word for the appendages attached to our upper body and the word for an implement or tool (think of the relationship of the words ”hand” and “handy”). The military or ”army” is the means for achieving some end. It is the tool for conducting war. I don’t appreciate war or find it of value (neither do I find humans of value, but for clearly different reasons). Therefore, I don’t appreciate the military.
It’s a shame that “politics” must always amount to posturing for the Democrats. I still believe this is why they can’t beat the Republicans - they refuse to ask hard questions or propose serious answers. Instead, they “appreciate the military.” Which is to say, they mouth words and perform deeds that are propagandistic at their heart. And, again, propaganda is a very basic way of disrespecting people and treating them as means to some end. Accordingly, people aren’t smart enough to be told the truth or brave enough to set out on the path of serious questioning (e.g. what is the military?). And, people are useful - in that their agreement can help one to secure or sustain “political” power. It would be sobering and inspiring if anyone in the “political sphere” had the guts and the vision to respect people and to treat them as priceless (or worthless) and therefore as deserving honesty. Apparently, this isn’t the sort of thing we can expect from the Democrats.